GMAT写作冲刺高分，但总是泛起拉后腿的问题。考生想要拿下GMAT写作的高分，还得把GMAT写作字数要求在控制着。下面各人就来看一下gmat写作要获得满分就要遵照下面的原则：

　　1. 字数高达599words, 充实体现了字数为王的判分倾向。

　　2. 尺度的五段制，首段、末了，中心三段，看上去很美。

　　3. 没有陈词滥调、满篇空话的模板式语言。

　　只有以上三点离满分照旧很远的，之以是SIX，我看更主要的在于，每段各尽其责，既自力又统一，形成了完整的ARGUMENT，specifically:

　　下面是一篇官方给出gmat作文满分的ARGUMENT范文，我们来一起赏析，看看它为何能scored six.

　　【中心段3】

　　Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

　　【末了】

　　In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Bore any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

　　1. 首段再现了原TOPIC的推理历程，并指出其assumptions多有不适;尤其令阅卷人兴奋的是：首段在最后简化枚举了推理中的三个问题。要知道美国人就喜欢的作文---总分式，在首段就把三个ideas枚举出来，然后在中心三段划分睁开，先总后分，一目了然。

　　2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可谓是一针见血，一剑封喉。对于这样严重的推理毛病，若是不首先指出，其argument一定软弱乏力。此所谓Topic中的“必削点”，不行不察。

　　以上就是小编跟各人分享的关于GMAT写作的内容，希望可以帮到有需要的同砚。也接待各人关注我们课窝官网相识更多信息，我们随时接待您的会见。